Triple
T1270568
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Xenophon's Apology of Socrates |
E15698
|
entity |
| Predicate | givesAlternativeAccountOf |
P16326
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Socrates' defense compared to Plato |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Socrates' defense compared to Plato | Statement: [Xenophon's Apology of Socrates, givesAlternativeAccountOf, Socrates' defense compared to Plato]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: givesAlternativeAccountOf Context triple: [Xenophon's Apology of Socrates, givesAlternativeAccountOf, Socrates' defense compared to Plato]
-
A.
isAlternativeTo
Indicates that one entity can serve as a substitute or different option in place of another.
-
B.
containsAccountOf
chosen
Indicates that one entity includes, records, or holds information about another entity’s account.
-
C.
associatedName
Indicates that one entity has an alternative or related name that is linked or connected to another entity.
-
D.
actsOnBehalfOf
Indicates that one entity performs actions or makes decisions as a representative or proxy for another entity.
-
E.
alsoKnownAs
Indicates that one entity is an alternative name, alias, or designation for another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a4935a94308190bb92555b79032824 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 7:28 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a4c0691d70819088e57c78ff34af1e |
completed | March 1, 2026, 10:40 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a4bede52a081909665d60acbe41d31 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 10:34 p.m. |
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:50 p.m.