Triple

T12691924
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Utica, Mississippi E303224 entity
Predicate hasName P744 FINISHED
Object Utica, Mississippi E303224 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Utica, Mississippi | Statement: [Utica, Mississippi, hasName, Utica, Mississippi]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Utica, Mississippi
Context triple: [Utica, Mississippi, hasName, Utica, Mississippi]
  • A. Utica, Mississippi chosen
    Utica, Mississippi is a small town in central Mississippi known for its rural character and location southwest of the state capital, Jackson.
  • B. Winona, Mississippi
    Winona, Mississippi is a small city in central Mississippi known as a local commercial and transportation hub along Interstate 55.
  • C. Waveland, Mississippi
    Waveland, Mississippi is a small Gulf Coast city in Hancock County known for its beachfront location and severe impact from Hurricane Katrina.
  • D. Puckett, Mississippi
    Puckett, Mississippi is a small rural village located in Rankin County in the central part of the state.
  • E. Newton, Mississippi
    Newton, Mississippi is a small city in eastern Mississippi that serves as a local commercial and community hub for the surrounding rural area.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d7bdef90d48190b46b88270e780946 completed April 9, 2026, 2:55 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69d961dbc91c8190bec50797bbd593db completed April 10, 2026, 8:47 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69f671acbd5c8190ad8d1d2f18868369 completed May 2, 2026, 9:50 p.m.
Created at: April 9, 2026, 5:22 p.m.