Triple

T12673717
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Soap & Glory E302749 entity
Predicate hasBrandPersonality P87955 FINISHED
Object playful LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: playful | Statement: [Soap & Glory, hasBrandPersonality, playful]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasBrandPersonality
Context triple: [Soap & Glory, hasBrandPersonality, playful]
  • A. hasBrandIdentityElement
    Indicates that an entity includes or is associated with a specific component of its overall brand identity (such as a logo, color scheme, or tagline).
  • B. hasBrandConcept chosen
    Indicates that an entity is associated with or embodies a particular brand concept or branding idea.
  • C. hasBrandType
    Indicates that an entity is associated with or categorized under a particular brand type or classification.
  • D. usesBrandCharacter
    Indicates that one entity employs or features another entity’s brand character (such as a mascot or branded persona) in its materials, products, or communications.
  • E. associatedBrandCulture
    Indicates a relationship where a brand is linked to, reflects, or is characterized by a particular culture, set of values, or shared norms.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d7bdee64a08190801c6d470aefd723 completed April 9, 2026, 2:55 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69d961af991c8190b6079cb57e593b8f completed April 10, 2026, 8:46 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69d960bb64ec8190bd0400cf0cc8b0a7 completed April 10, 2026, 8:42 p.m.
Created at: April 9, 2026, 5:20 p.m.