Triple

T12657880
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Marc de Jonge E302334 entity
Predicate hasFamilyName P18 FINISHED
Object de Jonge E173672 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: de Jonge | Statement: [Marc de Jonge, hasFamilyName, de Jonge]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: de Jonge
Context triple: [Marc de Jonge, hasFamilyName, de Jonge]
  • A. de Jonge chosen
    De Jonge is a Dutch surname borne by various notable figures, including politicians, artists, and athletes in the Netherlands.
  • B. Kees de Jonge
    Kees de Jonge is a Dutch individual known primarily as a namesake referenced in biographical and genealogical contexts rather than for widely documented public achievements.
  • C. Freek de Jonge
    Freek de Jonge is a Dutch cabaret performer, comedian, and writer known for his sharp political satire and influential role in the Netherlands’ modern cabaret tradition.
  • D. Oek de Jong
    Oek de Jong is a Dutch novelist known for his psychologically rich, stylistically refined prose and significant influence on contemporary Dutch literature.
  • E. Jurriaan de Jonge
    Jurriaan de Jonge is an individual notable enough to be specifically cited as a bearer of the Dutch surname "de Jonge."
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d7bded71a88190bb76e2413af9ea66 completed April 9, 2026, 2:55 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69d961636db8819099c438b24bcfd866 completed April 10, 2026, 8:45 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69f66885e44c8190a650301b0e86d0f4 completed May 2, 2026, 9:11 p.m.
Created at: April 9, 2026, 5:19 p.m.