Triple
T12657689
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | The Master of Disaster |
E302328
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasRingPersonaType |
P106046
|
FINISHED |
| Object | showman |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: showman | Statement: [The Master of Disaster, hasRingPersonaType, showman]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasRingPersonaType Context triple: [The Master of Disaster, hasRingPersonaType, showman]
-
A.
hasRing
Indicates that one entity possesses, wears, or is characterized by the presence of a ring.
-
B.
hasRingName
Indicates that an entity is associated with, or designated by, a specific ring name.
-
C.
associatedWithRing
Indicates that an entity has a connection or relationship with a specific ring, such as ownership, membership, or involvement.
-
D.
hasRingComposition
Indicates that one entity is composed of, or structurally organized around, a ring-like arrangement or circular structure.
-
E.
hasRingConfiguration
Indicates that one entity possesses or exhibits a specific arrangement or pattern of rings in its structure or form.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d7bded71a88190bb76e2413af9ea66 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 2:55 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d9617b07ec8190b714f04ae6654060 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 8:45 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d960b78ce8819091f15dd5013e6da5 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 8:42 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69d96179c7648190a05a13991d62bebb |
completed | April 10, 2026, 8:45 p.m. |
Created at: April 9, 2026, 5:19 p.m.