Triple
T12656580
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Council of Revision |
E302298
|
entity |
| Predicate | mentionedInDocument |
P831
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Madison’s notes of the Constitutional Convention |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Madison’s notes of the Constitutional Convention | Statement: [Council of Revision, mentionedInDocument, Madison’s notes of the Constitutional Convention]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: mentionedInDocument Context triple: [Council of Revision, mentionedInDocument, Madison’s notes of the Constitutional Convention]
-
A.
mentionedWith
Indicates that two entities are mentioned together or in close association within the same context, such as a document, sentence, or conversation.
-
B.
mentionedAs
Indicates that one entity is referred to or cited by name or description in the context of another entity.
-
C.
mentionedInInscription
Indicates that an entity is referenced or named within a specific inscription or inscribed text.
-
D.
governingDocumentMentioned
Indicates that a governing document is referenced or cited in relation to the entities involved.
-
E.
mentions
chosen
Indicates that one entity refers to, cites, or brings up another entity in some form of communication or content.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d7bded71a88190bb76e2413af9ea66 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 2:55 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d9617b07ec8190b714f04ae6654060 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 8:45 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d960b78ce8819091f15dd5013e6da5 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 8:42 p.m. |
Created at: April 9, 2026, 5:18 p.m.