Triple
T12656541
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Randolph Plan |
E302297
|
entity |
| Predicate | proposedJudiciarySelectionBy |
P42746
|
FINISHED |
| Object | national legislature |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: national legislature | Statement: [Randolph Plan, proposedJudiciarySelectionBy, national legislature]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: proposedJudiciarySelectionBy Context triple: [Randolph Plan, proposedJudiciarySelectionBy, national legislature]
-
A.
proposedJudiciary
Indicates that an entity has formally suggested or put forward another entity to serve in a judicial role or as part of a judicial body.
-
B.
judiciaryChosenBy
chosen
Indicates that the members of the judiciary are selected or appointed by a specified person, group, or institution.
-
C.
judgesElected
Indicates that the judges in question attained their positions through an electoral process rather than by appointment or other means.
-
D.
justicesSelectedFrom
Indicates that certain justices are chosen or appointed from a particular group, body, or pool of candidates.
-
E.
judiciaryProvision
Indicates the legal or constitutional rules, arrangements, or measures that establish, organize, or govern the functioning of the judiciary.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d7bded71a88190bb76e2413af9ea66 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 2:55 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d9617b07ec8190b714f04ae6654060 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 8:45 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d960b78ce8819091f15dd5013e6da5 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 8:42 p.m. |
Created at: April 9, 2026, 5:18 p.m.