Triple
T12648914
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Cedar Falls–Waterloo area |
E302103
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasCity |
P316
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Hudson, Iowa |
E287277
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Hudson, Iowa | Statement: [Cedar Falls–Waterloo area, hasCity, Hudson, Iowa]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Hudson, Iowa Context triple: [Cedar Falls–Waterloo area, hasCity, Hudson, Iowa]
-
A.
Hudson, Iowa
chosen
Hudson, Iowa is a small city in northeastern Iowa that functions as a suburban community within the Waterloo–Cedar Falls metropolitan area.
-
B.
Hancock, Iowa
Hancock, Iowa is a small rural city located in western Iowa within Pottawattamie County.
-
C.
Havelock, Iowa
Havelock, Iowa is a small rural city in Pocahontas County in northwestern Iowa.
-
D.
Riverside, Iowa
Riverside, Iowa is a small city best known as the self-proclaimed future birthplace of Star Trek’s Captain James T. Kirk.
-
E.
Hamlin, Iowa
Hamlin, Iowa is a small unincorporated rural community located in Audubon County in western Iowa.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d7bdec9f9c8190b4bac675b7588211 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 2:55 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d9615cf6f48190bd0983cf7465ab15 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 8:45 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69f6cbb2a1088190974e9736873466d1 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 4:14 a.m. |
Created at: April 9, 2026, 5:18 p.m.