Triple
T12637064
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | 12 Angry Men |
E301791
|
entity |
| Predicate | leadCharacter |
P1668
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Juror 8 |
E845433
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Juror 8 | Statement: [12 Angry Men, leadCharacter, Juror 8]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Juror 8 Context triple: [12 Angry Men, leadCharacter, Juror 8]
-
A.
Juror 8
chosen
Juror 8 is the calm, analytical juror who stands as the lone initial dissenter and moral center of the deliberations in *12 Angry Men*.
-
B.
Juror 9
Juror 9 is the elderly, observant juror in "12 Angry Men" who plays a key role in challenging assumptions and supporting a careful reexamination of the evidence.
-
C.
Juror 12
Juror 12 is a character in *12 Angry Men*, typically portrayed as an indecisive, advertising-focused professional whose superficial reasoning contrasts with the deeper moral deliberations of the jury.
-
D.
Juror 11
Juror 11 is a thoughtful, foreign-born watchmaker and naturalized American citizen in *12 Angry Men* whose respect for democracy and justice shapes his careful deliberation in the jury room.
-
E.
Juror 4
Juror 4 is the calm, analytical, and methodical juror in "12 Angry Men," known for his logical approach and reliance on facts over emotion during the jury's deliberations.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d7bdec9f9c8190b4bac675b7588211 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 2:55 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d96147f49c8190b701e1e27e207a95 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 8:44 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69f66873706c8190a9908d1a8629b1c5 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 9:11 p.m. |
Created at: April 9, 2026, 5:16 p.m.