Triple
T12633630
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Quaestiones in Metaphysicam Aristotelis |
E301704
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | commentary on Aristotle |
C14174
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: commentary on Aristotle Context triple: [Quaestiones in Metaphysicam Aristotelis, instanceOf, commentary on Aristotle]
-
A.
commentator on Aristotle
chosen
A commentator on Aristotle is a scholar who interprets, explains, and critically engages with Aristotle’s texts to clarify their meaning, context, and philosophical implications for contemporary and historical audiences.
-
B.
work by Aristotle
A work by Aristotle is any philosophical, scientific, or literary text authored by Aristotle that articulates his theories, arguments, or observations on subjects such as metaphysics, ethics, logic, politics, rhetoric, or natural science.
-
C.
work of Aristotle
The work of Aristotle encompasses a comprehensive body of writings in logic, metaphysics, ethics, politics, natural science, and poetics that systematically investigate the principles, causes, and purposes underlying reality and human life.
-
D.
commentary on Cicero
A commentary on Cicero is a scholarly work that explains, interprets, and contextualizes Cicero’s texts—linguistically, historically, and philosophically—to clarify their meaning and significance for readers.
-
E.
commentator on Plato
A commentator on Plato is a scholar or writer who analyzes, interprets, and explains Plato’s dialogues, arguments, and philosophical ideas, often situating them within their historical context and assessing their relevance to later thought.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d7bdec9f9c8190b4bac675b7588211 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 2:55 p.m. |
Created at: April 9, 2026, 5:15 p.m.