Triple

T12628854
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject John Kelly E301586 entity
Predicate subjectOf P38 FINISHED
Object Goldberg v. Kelly (1970) U.S. Supreme Court decision E54958 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Goldberg v. Kelly (1970) U.S. Supreme Court decision | Statement: [John Kelly, subjectOf, Goldberg v. Kelly (1970) U.S. Supreme Court decision]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: Goldberg v. Kelly (1970) U.S. Supreme Court decision
Context triple: [John Kelly, subjectOf, Goldberg v. Kelly (1970) U.S. Supreme Court decision]
  • A. Goldberg v. Kelly chosen
    Goldberg v. Kelly is a landmark 1970 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held welfare recipients are entitled to an evidentiary hearing before their benefits are terminated, significantly expanding procedural due process protections.
  • B. Rostker v. Goldberg
    Rostker v. Goldberg is a 1981 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the constitutionality of requiring only men, and not women, to register for the military draft.
  • C. Goldman v. United States
    Goldman v. United States is a 1942 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld warrantless electronic eavesdropping based on a narrow, property-based interpretation of the Fourth Amendment, later limited by the Court’s shift to a privacy-based approach.
  • D. Katzenbach v. Morgan
    Katzenbach v. Morgan is a 1966 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld Congress’s power under the Fourteenth Amendment to prohibit certain state voting restrictions, reinforcing federal authority to protect voting rights.
  • E. Regan v. Wald
    Regan v. Wald is a 1984 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld federal restrictions on travel to Cuba, affirming broad executive authority over foreign affairs and economic sanctions.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d7bdeaf49c8190b13800111fa77ea3 completed April 9, 2026, 2:55 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69d9610ce9e48190a496824002c0d2be completed April 10, 2026, 8:43 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69f65edafc7c819088bd641542a32e39 completed May 2, 2026, 8:30 p.m.
Created at: April 9, 2026, 5:15 p.m.