Triple
T12614925
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Chief Acquisition Officers Council |
E301226
|
entity |
| Predicate | overseesDomain |
P20679
|
FINISHED |
| Object | federal acquisition |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: federal acquisition | Statement: [Chief Acquisition Officers Council, overseesDomain, federal acquisition]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: overseesDomain Context triple: [Chief Acquisition Officers Council, overseesDomain, federal acquisition]
-
A.
controlDomain
Indicates that one entity has authority over, manages, or regulates the scope, behavior, or operations of another entity or system.
-
B.
overseesDivision
Indicates that one entity has managerial or supervisory responsibility over a specific division of an organization.
-
C.
regulatoryDomain
Indicates that one entity defines or governs the rules, policies, or constraints under which another entity must operate.
-
D.
oversee
chosen
Indicates having responsibility for supervising, directing, or managing the actions or work of another entity.
-
E.
indicatesDomain
Indicates a domain or area of knowledge, activity, or applicability to which something (such as a concept, resource, or entity) belongs or is relevant.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d7bdeaf49c8190b13800111fa77ea3 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 2:55 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d9617b07ec8190b714f04ae6654060 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 8:45 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d960b195108190ac25bd95e644ace4 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 8:42 p.m. |
Created at: April 9, 2026, 5:12 p.m.