Triple

T1261297
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Emacs Lisp E12505 entity
Predicate scopeOption P26381 FINISHED
Object lexical scope (via lexical-binding) LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: lexical scope (via lexical-binding) | Statement: [Emacs Lisp, scopeOption, lexical scope (via lexical-binding)]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: scopeOption
Context triple: [Emacs Lisp, scopeOption, lexical scope (via lexical-binding)]
  • A. scopeDetail
    Indicates a more specific or refined characterization of the extent, boundaries, or coverage of something within a broader scope.
  • B. decisionScope
    Indicates the range or domain within which a particular decision is valid, applicable, or has authority.
  • C. scopeOfUse
    Indicates the range, context, or conditions under which something is intended, allowed, or applicable to be used.
  • D. scopeOfProducts
    Indicates the range or extent of products that fall under a particular category, responsibility, or context.
  • E. missionScope
    Indicates the defined range, objectives, and boundaries within which a mission or operation is intended to be carried out.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a4933352e08190ac617291985e76c0 completed March 1, 2026, 7:27 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a4bfc64e648190b9c4f980eb8168aa completed March 1, 2026, 10:37 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a4bb6eefbc81908dddd7d2ef368186 completed March 1, 2026, 10:19 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69a4bd98b62c8190a5f6710345c0537d completed March 1, 2026, 10:28 p.m.
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:50 p.m.