Triple
T1261216
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Eagle (10-dollar gold coin) |
E12504
|
entity |
| Predicate | compositionStandard |
P8601
|
FINISHED |
| Object | .9167 fine gold |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: .9167 fine gold | Statement: [Eagle (10-dollar gold coin), compositionStandard, .9167 fine gold]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: compositionStandard Context triple: [Eagle (10-dollar gold coin), compositionStandard, .9167 fine gold]
-
A.
standardComposition
chosen
Indicates that one entity is composed or constructed according to a recognized or conventional standard defined by another entity.
-
B.
compositionRule
Indicates how multiple elements or components are combined or arranged according to a specific rule or pattern.
-
C.
compositionMethod
Indicates the technique or process by which something is composed, created, or constructed.
-
D.
specialComposition
Indicates that one entity is composed of another in a distinctive or non-standard way, highlighting a particular or exceptional form of composition between them.
-
E.
composedIn
Indicates that a creative work was written or musically composed within a particular place or during a specific time period.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a4933352e08190ac617291985e76c0 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 7:27 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a4bfc64e648190b9c4f980eb8168aa |
completed | March 1, 2026, 10:37 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a4bb6eefbc81908dddd7d2ef368186 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 10:19 p.m. |
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:50 p.m.