Triple
T12609091
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Ricercar a 3 |
E301063
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasCounterpointType |
P83101
|
FINISHED |
| Object | imitative counterpoint |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: imitative counterpoint | Statement: [Ricercar a 3, hasCounterpointType, imitative counterpoint]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasCounterpointType Context triple: [Ricercar a 3, hasCounterpointType, imitative counterpoint]
-
A.
usesCounterpoint
Indicates that one entity employs counterpoint, combining independent melodic lines in a structured, interdependent musical relationship with another.
-
B.
containsCounterpoint
Indicates that one element includes or incorporates another element that serves as a contrasting or opposing argument, idea, or perspective.
-
C.
hasCounterpart
Indicates that one entity corresponds to, matches, or serves as an equivalent or parallel version of another entity.
-
D.
hasContrapuntalWriting
chosen
Indicates that one musical entity features contrapuntal writing in relation to another, meaning multiple independent melodic lines are combined according to contrapuntal principles.
-
E.
hasCounterexample
Indicates that there exists at least one specific case or instance that disproves or violates a given claim, rule, or general statement.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d7bdea2ca881908f379526c13b1145 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 2:55 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d9559458dc8190bc4d6e697e99d70e |
completed | April 10, 2026, 7:55 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d9541894fc8190a0c3706a414279f0 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 7:48 p.m. |
Created at: April 9, 2026, 5:11 p.m.