Triple
T12603529
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Sanjak of Eğriboz |
E300916
|
entity |
| Predicate | locatedIn |
P40
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Rumelia Eyalet |
E155886
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Rumelia Eyalet | Statement: [Sanjak of Eğriboz, locatedIn, Rumelia Eyalet]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Rumelia Eyalet Context triple: [Sanjak of Eğriboz, locatedIn, Rumelia Eyalet]
-
A.
Rumelia Eyalet
chosen
Rumelia Eyalet was a major administrative province of the Ottoman Empire in the Balkans, encompassing much of its European territory for several centuries.
-
B.
Anatolia Eyalet
Anatolia Eyalet was a major administrative province of the Ottoman Empire encompassing much of western and central Anatolia.
-
C.
Sanjak of Genç
The Sanjak of Genç was an Ottoman Empire administrative district centered on the town of Genç in what is now eastern Turkey.
-
D.
Sidon Eyalet
Sidon Eyalet was an Ottoman provincial administrative region in the Levant, centered on the coastal city of Sidon and governed by various pashas over its history.
-
E.
Sanjak of Muş
The Sanjak of Muş was an administrative district of the Ottoman Empire centered on the town of Muş in eastern Anatolia.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d7bdea2ca881908f379526c13b1145 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 2:55 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d954e6e20481908bca684c4b497c48 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 7:52 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69f65ecb09e481909d688f174372dde7 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 8:30 p.m. |
Created at: April 9, 2026, 5:10 p.m.