Triple

T12601611
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Cepsa E300869 entity
Predicate hasBrand P1500 FINISHED
Object Cepsa E300869 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Cepsa | Statement: [Cepsa, hasBrand, Cepsa]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Cepsa
Context triple: [Cepsa, hasBrand, Cepsa]
  • A. Cepsa chosen
    Cepsa is a Spanish integrated energy and petrochemical company involved in oil and gas exploration, refining, and the production of chemical products.
  • B. Alianza Petrolera
    Alianza Petrolera is a professional Colombian football club that competes in the country’s top division, Categoría Primera A.
  • C. Uniper
    Uniper is a German energy company focused on power generation and global energy trading, formed from the conventional energy business spun off from E.ON.
  • D. Endesa
    Endesa is a major Spanish electric utility company and one of the leading energy providers in the Iberian Peninsula and Latin America.
  • E. TotalEnergies
    TotalEnergies is a major French multinational energy company engaged in oil, gas, and renewable energy production and distribution worldwide.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d7bdea2ca881908f379526c13b1145 completed April 9, 2026, 2:55 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69d954d1f6ac8190ab21ca7bcbc80129 completed April 10, 2026, 7:51 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69f66869c0b08190b13bcebbe354cd98 completed May 2, 2026, 9:11 p.m.
Created at: April 9, 2026, 5:09 p.m.