Triple
T12595817
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Iraca |
E300726
|
entity |
| Predicate | comparability |
P278
|
FINISHED |
| Object | similar to a priest‑king |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: similar to a priest‑king | Statement: [Iraca, comparability, similar to a priest‑king]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: comparability Context triple: [Iraca, comparability, similar to a priest‑king]
-
A.
comparisonType
Indicates the specific kind of comparison being made between two or more values or entities (e.g., equality, inequality, ordering, or similarity).
-
B.
comparisonProperty
Indicates that one entity is being compared to another based on a specific shared property or attribute.
-
C.
isComparedTo
chosen
Indicates that one entity is evaluated or measured in relation to another to highlight similarities, differences, or relative qualities.
-
D.
comparisonAspect
Indicates that two or more entities are being compared specifically with respect to a particular shared attribute or dimension.
-
E.
comparisonResult
Indicates the outcome of comparing two entities, typically expressing whether one is less than, equal to, or greater than the other.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d7bdea2ca881908f379526c13b1145 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 2:55 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d954e6e20481908bca684c4b497c48 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 7:52 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d95416cbd88190b2c65196162349bc |
completed | April 10, 2026, 7:48 p.m. |
Created at: April 9, 2026, 5:08 p.m.