Triple
T125777
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | English barons |
E2546
|
entity |
| Predicate | legalBasisOfPower |
P1002
|
FINISHED |
| Object | feudal tenure |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: feudal tenure | Statement: [English barons, legalBasisOfPower, feudal tenure]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: legalBasisOfPower Context triple: [English barons, legalBasisOfPower, feudal tenure]
-
A.
legalBasis
Indicates the legal rule, authority, or justification under which an action, decision, or status is established or carried out.
-
B.
hasLegislativePower
Indicates that an entity possesses the authority to create, amend, or repeal laws within a given jurisdiction or governing framework.
-
C.
sovereigntyBasedOn
chosen
Indicates that one entity’s sovereignty or governing authority is derived from, justified by, or contingent upon another specified basis or source.
-
D.
relatedLegislation
Indicates that there exists a legislative document that is connected to, affects, or is otherwise relevant to the subject entity.
-
E.
legalDoctrine
Indicates that one legal principle, rule, or theory is being applied, referenced, or relied upon as an authoritative basis for interpreting or deciding a legal issue.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a251b54ea88190b18281669f59b4c0 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:23 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a25760af348190bf402089c240887d |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:48 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a2564c11208190ad25495609d94d87 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:43 a.m. |
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 2:27 a.m.