Triple

T12576406
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Monguor (Tu) language E300215 entity
Predicate languageCodeGlottolog P3086 FINISHED
Object mong1330 LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: mong1330 | Statement: [Monguor (Tu) language, languageCodeGlottolog, mong1330]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: languageCodeGlottolog
Context triple: [Monguor (Tu) language, languageCodeGlottolog, mong1330]
  • A. glottocode chosen
    Indicates the standardized Glottolog code that uniquely identifies the language or dialect associated with an entity.
  • B. ISO639-3CodeOfLanguage
    Indicates that one entity is the ISO 639-3 three-letter language code assigned to the language represented by the other entity.
  • C. sharesISO639-3CodeWith
    Indicates that two language entities share the same ISO 639-3 code, meaning they are treated as the same language in that coding system.
  • D. glottoCategory
    Indicates the linguistic classification or type (such as language family, subgroup, or category) to which a language or dialect is assigned.
  • E. ISO639-6Code
    Indicates the standardized ISO 639-6 four-letter code that uniquely identifies a specific language variety or dialect.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d7bde87b648190bcd0266e9efde098 completed April 9, 2026, 2:55 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69d9550d84908190aea0f50055f6d92e completed April 10, 2026, 7:52 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69d95414692881909c52a1de7d224b44 completed April 10, 2026, 7:48 p.m.
Created at: April 9, 2026, 4:47 p.m.