Triple

T12559066
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Petrovna E295292 entity
Predicate patronymicFormationPattern P42523 FINISHED
Object Pyotr + ovna LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Pyotr + ovna | Statement: [Petrovna, patronymicFormationPattern, Pyotr + ovna]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: patronymicFormationPattern
Context triple: [Petrovna, patronymicFormationPattern, Pyotr + ovna]
  • A. patronymicSystem
    Indicates a naming relationship where a person’s name is derived from or based on the given name of a parent or ancestor.
  • B. patronymicName
    Indicates that one entity’s name is derived from or based on the given name of a parent or ancestor, typically the father.
  • C. patronymicSuffix chosen
    Indicates that one entity is a suffix added to a personal name to denote lineage or descent from another person, typically the father.
  • D. isPatronymicSurname
    Indicates that a surname is derived from the given name of a father or male ancestor, typically signifying "son/daughter of" that person.
  • E. isPatronymicName
    Indicates that a name is derived from a father’s or ancestor’s given name, typically signifying lineage or descent.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d6ad9cac2c81908e8a7bed82d1e21d completed April 8, 2026, 7:33 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69d95f5507b481908d13cc317b7402f6 completed April 10, 2026, 8:36 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69d95410d0b0819097646edd1b837104 completed April 10, 2026, 7:48 p.m.
Created at: April 8, 2026, 11:48 p.m.