Triple

T12555993
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Karen script E295216 entity
Predicate hasToneLettersOrMarks P67250 FINISHED
Object yes LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: yes | Statement: [Karen script, hasToneLettersOrMarks, yes]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasToneLettersOrMarks
Context triple: [Karen script, hasToneLettersOrMarks, yes]
  • A. usesToneMarks chosen
    Indicates that one entity applies or includes diacritical tone marks in the representation or transcription of another entity (such as text, language, or symbols).
  • B. hasCombiningMarks
    Indicates that an entity (such as a character or string) includes one or more combining marks attached to a base element.
  • C. hasPhonemicTone
    Indicates that a language, word, or syllable uses pitch differences (tones) as phonemic contrasts that can change meaning.
  • D. hasConsonantSigns
    Indicates that one entity possesses or includes consonant sign characters as part of its representation or structure.
  • E. hasNuktaLikeSigns
    Indicates that one element possesses or includes diacritic marks that are similar in form or function to nukta signs.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d6ad9cac2c81908e8a7bed82d1e21d completed April 8, 2026, 7:33 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69d95f5507b481908d13cc317b7402f6 completed April 10, 2026, 8:36 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69d95410d0b0819097646edd1b837104 completed April 10, 2026, 7:48 p.m.
Created at: April 8, 2026, 11:47 p.m.