Triple
T12546930
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Lane Cove River |
E299993
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasAdjacentSuburb |
P41355
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Lindfield |
E432983
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Lindfield | Statement: [Lane Cove River, hasAdjacentSuburb, Lindfield]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Lindfield Context triple: [Lane Cove River, hasAdjacentSuburb, Lindfield]
-
A.
Lidington
Lidington is an English surname most notably borne by British Conservative politician David Lidington.
-
B.
Rustington
Rustington is a large coastal village and civil parish on the English Channel in the Arun District of West Sussex, England.
-
C.
Lindfield, West Sussex
chosen
Lindfield, West Sussex is a historic and picturesque village in southeastern England known for its traditional High Street, village common, and conservation-area character.
-
D.
Limpsfield
Limpsfield is a historic village and civil parish in Surrey, England, known for its picturesque countryside and traditional English character.
-
E.
Henfield
Henfield is a large historic village and civil parish in the Horsham District of West Sussex, England, known for its rural character and community amenities.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d6ada707008190aaec1238117c9379 |
completed | April 8, 2026, 7:33 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d95481ba28819099f7cd2de02e8837 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 7:50 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69f655826bbc8190af20858342c008ff |
completed | May 2, 2026, 7:50 p.m. |
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:57 p.m.