Triple
T12533065
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Symphonic Variations |
E299617
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasNoNarrative |
P105752
|
FINISHED |
| Object | true |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [Symphonic Variations, hasNoNarrative, true]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasNoNarrative Context triple: [Symphonic Variations, hasNoNarrative, true]
-
A.
hasNarrative
Indicates that one entity contains, presents, or is associated with a story or narrative about another entity or subject.
-
B.
containsNarrativeOf
Indicates that one entity includes or presents the story, account, or narrative content of another entity.
-
C.
hasNarrativeRole
Indicates that an entity participates in a narrative with a specific functional role (e.g., protagonist, antagonist, narrator) relative to the story.
-
D.
hasNoProgrammaticStory
Indicates that there is no defined or implemented programmatic logic, behavior, or narrative associated with the given entity or context.
-
E.
hasNarrativeOutcome
Indicates that an event, action, or narrative element leads to or results in a particular story-related consequence or resolution.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d6ada5cdd48190860d9ce30aff69be |
completed | April 8, 2026, 7:33 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d95f5507b481908d13cc317b7402f6 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 8:36 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d9540d7b788190a0d57b098e90e491 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 7:48 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69d95f5148948190946a575d812b329d |
completed | April 10, 2026, 8:36 p.m. |
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:57 p.m.