Triple
T1253041
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Always Be My Baby |
E26920
|
entity |
| Predicate | compositionForm |
P25843
|
FINISHED |
| Object | ballad |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: ballad | Statement: [Always Be My Baby, compositionForm, ballad]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: compositionForm Context triple: [Always Be My Baby, compositionForm, ballad]
-
A.
composedIn
Indicates that a creative work was written or musically composed within a particular place or during a specific time period.
-
B.
composedBy
Indicates that one entity is the creator or author of a musical or artistic work associated with another entity.
-
C.
specialComposition
Indicates that one entity is composed of another in a distinctive or non-standard way, highlighting a particular or exceptional form of composition between them.
-
D.
formsWith
Indicates that one entity combines or associates with another to create or constitute a joint structure, group, or configuration.
-
E.
logicalForm
Indicates a relationship where an expression is associated with its structured, formal logical representation.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a49487a9c48190ba9b05348fd1b53f |
completed | March 1, 2026, 7:33 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a4bf875cf48190b6781d41097ee39b |
completed | March 1, 2026, 10:36 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a4bb6c977c8190a2bf3e8b67a59beb |
completed | March 1, 2026, 10:19 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69a4bc49693c8190978ec63a5171d342 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 10:23 p.m. |
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:47 p.m.