Triple

T12529100
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Prelude in C major, BWV 846 E299512 entity
Predicate tuningContext P91215 FINISHED
Object example piece for well-tempered tuning systems LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: example piece for well-tempered tuning systems | Statement: [Prelude in C major, BWV 846, tuningContext, example piece for well-tempered tuning systems]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: tuningContext
Context triple: [Prelude in C major, BWV 846, tuningContext, example piece for well-tempered tuning systems]
  • A. tuning
    Indicates the adjustment or calibration of something’s parameters or settings to achieve desired performance or behavior.
  • B. tuningMethod
    Indicates the method or approach used to adjust or optimize something’s parameters or performance.
  • C. tunedBy
    Indicates that one entity has been adjusted or calibrated in its settings, parameters, or configuration by another entity.
  • D. tuningOfInstrument
    Indicates the specific tuning configuration or pitch arrangement applied to a musical instrument.
  • E. contextType chosen
    Indicates the type or category of contextual information associated with an entity or event.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d6ada5cdd48190860d9ce30aff69be completed April 8, 2026, 7:33 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69d95f5507b481908d13cc317b7402f6 completed April 10, 2026, 8:36 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69d9540d7b788190a0d57b098e90e491 completed April 10, 2026, 7:48 p.m.
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:57 p.m.