Triple

T12529010
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject BWV 846–893 E299511 entity
Predicate hasKeyCoverage P105728 FINISHED
Object all 24 major and minor keys LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: all 24 major and minor keys | Statement: [BWV 846–893, hasKeyCoverage, all 24 major and minor keys]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasKeyCoverage
Context triple: [BWV 846–893, hasKeyCoverage, all 24 major and minor keys]
  • A. hasCoverage
    Indicates that one entity provides insurance or protection coverage for another entity or subject.
  • B. keyCoverage
    Indicates that one entity provides coverage, protection, or applicability for another in a way that is essential or central to its function or requirements.
  • C. hasCoverageFocus
    Indicates that one entity’s coverage, attention, or analysis is specifically focused on or directed toward another entity.
  • D. isCoveredBy
    Indicates that one entity is physically or conceptually overlaid, protected, or enclosed by another entity.
  • E. hasCoverFeature
    Indicates that one entity serves as a prominent or featured element on the cover of another entity (such as a publication, product, or media item).
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d6ada5cdd48190860d9ce30aff69be completed April 8, 2026, 7:33 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69d95f5507b481908d13cc317b7402f6 completed April 10, 2026, 8:36 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69d9540d7b788190a0d57b098e90e491 completed April 10, 2026, 7:48 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69d95f5148948190946a575d812b329d completed April 10, 2026, 8:36 p.m.
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:57 p.m.