Triple
T12515685
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Twofish |
E299185
|
entity |
| Predicate | wasAESFinalist |
P105392
|
FINISHED |
| Object | true |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [Twofish, wasAESFinalist, true]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: wasAESFinalist Context triple: [Twofish, wasAESFinalist, true]
-
A.
cryptDesigner
Indicates that an entity is the designer or creator responsible for planning or conceiving a particular crypt.
-
B.
Merkle–Damgård strengthening
Indicates that a hash function construction applies Merkle–Damgård strengthening, meaning the message is padded with its length (and possibly other structured padding) before processing to help ensure collision resistance and proper security properties.
-
C.
usesFinalPermutation
Indicates that an entity applies or relies on a final permutation step (typically a last reordering or transformation) within a process or algorithm.
-
D.
cryptographicModel
Indicates a relationship where one entity serves as, or is based on, a particular cryptographic scheme, framework, or formal model.
-
E.
cryptanalysisStatus
Indicates the current state or outcome of efforts to analyze or break a cryptographic system or cipher.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d6ada5cdd48190860d9ce30aff69be |
completed | April 8, 2026, 7:33 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d954b867dc8190af8a70f797e4d133 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 7:51 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d954096af88190b6be81b008c82139 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 7:48 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69d954b715fc819091fa84430be46273 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 7:51 p.m. |
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:57 p.m.