Triple
T12515286
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | S-record |
E299177
|
entity |
| Predicate | supports32BitAddresses |
P3704
|
FINISHED |
| Object | true |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [S-record, supports32BitAddresses, true]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: supports32BitAddresses Context triple: [S-record, supports32BitAddresses, true]
-
A.
supportsByteAddressing
Indicates that one entity provides the capability for direct access to individual bytes within its addressable memory or data space for another entity.
-
B.
supports64BitApps
Indicates that the subject is capable of running or is compatible with 64-bit applications.
-
C.
supportsCursorAddressing
Indicates that one entity provides the capability to position or move a cursor programmatically within another entity (such as a display or text interface).
-
D.
supportsIntel64
Indicates that one entity provides compatibility with or operational support for Intel 64-bit (x86-64) architecture in relation to another entity.
-
E.
supportsAddressTypes
chosen
Indicates that an entity is capable of handling or working with one or more specified types of addresses.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d6ada5cdd48190860d9ce30aff69be |
completed | April 8, 2026, 7:33 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d954b867dc8190af8a70f797e4d133 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 7:51 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d954096af88190b6be81b008c82139 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 7:48 p.m. |
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:57 p.m.