Triple
T12506682
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Maros |
E298965
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasMouthIn |
P1008
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Tisza River |
E37143
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Tisza River | Statement: [Maros, hasMouthIn, Tisza River]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Tisza River Context triple: [Maros, hasMouthIn, Tisza River]
-
A.
Tisza
chosen
The Tisza is one of Central Europe's significant rivers, flowing through several countries including Hungary before joining the Danube.
-
B.
Szamos River
The Szamos River is a Central European river flowing through Romania and Hungary, known for joining the Tisa River and draining part of the Eastern Carpathians.
-
C.
Zala River
The Zala River is a major river in western Hungary that drains a large catchment area before emptying into Lake Balaton.
-
D.
Kapós River
The Kapós River is a watercourse in southwestern Hungary that flows through the Transdanubian region before joining the Sió River.
-
E.
Sajó River
The Sajó River is a waterway in Central Europe, chiefly in present-day Hungary and Slovakia, historically notable as the site of the Mongol victory over the Kingdom of Hungary at the 1241 Battle of Mohi.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d6ada4cd388190ae3bbf83ff87057a |
completed | April 8, 2026, 7:33 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d9541ace208190a5149b6f18fa196d |
completed | April 10, 2026, 7:48 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69f65eac74608190a6f1941ed5a05212 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 8:29 p.m. |
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:57 p.m.