Triple
T1247870
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Taliban |
E26807
|
entity |
| Predicate | interpretationOfSharia |
P5494
|
FINISHED |
| Object | strict |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: strict | Statement: [Taliban, interpretationOfSharia, strict]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: interpretationOfSharia Context triple: [Taliban, interpretationOfSharia, strict]
-
A.
religiousJurisdiction
Indicates that one entity holds official religious authority or governance over another entity or area.
-
B.
normativeStatusInIslam
Indicates the evaluative ruling or status that Islamic law or ethics assigns to an action, practice, or state (e.g., obligatory, recommended, permissible, disliked, or forbidden).
-
C.
classifiesMuslimsWhoDiffer
Indicates treating or labeling Muslims who hold differing beliefs, practices, or views as a distinct or separate group.
-
D.
viewsHalakhaAs
Indicates that one entity regards or interprets Halakha (Jewish law) in a particular way, such as considering it authoritative, binding, flexible, or symbolic.
-
E.
theologicalInterpretation
chosen
Indicates a relationship where an event, text, or phenomenon is understood or explained through religious or doctrinal beliefs and principles.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a49487a9c48190ba9b05348fd1b53f |
completed | March 1, 2026, 7:33 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a4bf827e088190a16d845cea14f2c9 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 10:36 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a4bb6b075881908e867c25b5080e25 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 10:19 p.m. |
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:47 p.m.