Triple

T12471098
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act E298056 entity
Predicate partiallyInvalidatedBy P14663 FINISHED
Object Davis v. Federal Election Commission E985771 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Davis v. Federal Election Commission | Statement: [Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act, partiallyInvalidatedBy, Davis v. Federal Election Commission]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: Davis v. Federal Election Commission
Context triple: [Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act, partiallyInvalidatedBy, Davis v. Federal Election Commission]
  • A. Davis v. Federal Election Commission chosen
    Davis v. Federal Election Commission is a 2008 U.S. Supreme Court case that struck down the “millionaire’s amendment” to federal campaign finance law as an unconstitutional burden on self-financed candidates’ First Amendment rights.
  • B. McConnell v. Federal Election Commission
    McConnell v. Federal Election Commission is a 2003 U.S. Supreme Court case that largely upheld the constitutionality of the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act (McCain–Feingold Act), significantly shaping modern campaign finance law.
  • C. Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission
    Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission is a landmark 2010 U.S. Supreme Court case that dramatically expanded the political spending rights of corporations and unions by treating such expenditures as protected speech.
  • D. Brnovich v. Democratic National Committee
    Brnovich v. Democratic National Committee is a 2021 U.S. Supreme Court decision that significantly narrowed the scope of federal protections against voting discrimination, particularly under Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act.
  • E. Buckley v. Valeo
    Buckley v. Valeo is a landmark 1976 U.S. Supreme Court decision that reshaped campaign finance law by equating certain limits on political spending with restrictions on free speech under the First Amendment.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d6ada270808190b1a2b2e7b02bb426 completed April 8, 2026, 7:33 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69d94dba7f6c8190b272f649e0777362 completed April 10, 2026, 7:21 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69f6556aae84819083e4988ec6f21471 completed May 2, 2026, 7:50 p.m.
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:56 p.m.