Triple

Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).

Phrase: FEC v. Wisconsin Right to Life, Inc. | Statement: [Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act, partiallyInvalidatedBy, FEC v. Wisconsin Right to Life, Inc.]

Target entity: FEC v. Wisconsin Right to Life, Inc.
Context triple: [Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act, partiallyInvalidatedBy, FEC v. Wisconsin Right to Life, Inc.]

• A. Planned Parenthood v. Abbott
  Planned Parenthood v. Abbott is a 2013 federal court case in which abortion providers challenged Texas restrictions that imposed stringent requirements on abortion clinics and physicians, arguing they placed an undue burden on women seeking abortions.
• B. McConnell v. Federal Election Commission
  McConnell v. Federal Election Commission is a 2003 U.S. Supreme Court case that largely upheld the constitutionality of the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act (McCain–Feingold Act), significantly shaping modern campaign finance law.
• C. Cantwell v. Connecticut
  Cantwell v. Connecticut is a 1940 U.S. Supreme Court case that first applied the First Amendment’s Free Exercise Clause to the states, striking down a state law that improperly restricted religious proselytizing.
• D. Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission
  Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission is a landmark 2010 U.S. Supreme Court case that dramatically expanded the political spending rights of corporations and unions by treating such expenditures as protected speech.
• E. Planned Parenthood v. Danforth
  Planned Parenthood v. Danforth was a 1976 U.S. Supreme Court decision that struck down several Missouri abortion restrictions, including spousal and parental consent requirements, as unconstitutional.
• F. None of above. chosen
• G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Generate a one-sentence description of the target entity. 
You are given a context triple in the form (subject, predicate, object), where the object is the target entity. 
# Instructions
Use the triple to infer relevant information about the entity. Describe the entity based on what is most defining, well-known. 
Avoid repeating the information from the triple, unless really essential.
# Response Format
Return only the sentence: "Description: [one-sentence description of the target entity]"

Entity: FEC v. Wisconsin Right to Life, Inc.
Triple: [Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act, partiallyInvalidatedBy, FEC v. Wisconsin Right to Life, Inc.]

FEC v. Wisconsin Right to Life, Inc. is a 2007 U.S. Supreme Court decision that narrowed restrictions on corporate-funded political issue ads, weakening parts of the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act’s campaign finance limits.

Target entity: FEC v. Wisconsin Right to Life, Inc.
Target entity description: FEC v. Wisconsin Right to Life, Inc. is a 2007 U.S. Supreme Court decision that narrowed restrictions on corporate-funded political issue ads, weakening parts of the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act’s campaign finance limits.

• A. Planned Parenthood v. Abbott
  Planned Parenthood v. Abbott is a 2013 federal court case in which abortion providers challenged Texas restrictions that imposed stringent requirements on abortion clinics and physicians, arguing they placed an undue burden on women seeking abortions.
• B. McConnell v. Federal Election Commission
  McConnell v. Federal Election Commission is a 2003 U.S. Supreme Court case that largely upheld the constitutionality of the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act (McCain–Feingold Act), significantly shaping modern campaign finance law.
• C. Cantwell v. Connecticut
  Cantwell v. Connecticut is a 1940 U.S. Supreme Court case that first applied the First Amendment’s Free Exercise Clause to the states, striking down a state law that improperly restricted religious proselytizing.
• D. Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission
  Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission is a landmark 2010 U.S. Supreme Court case that dramatically expanded the political spending rights of corporations and unions by treating such expenditures as protected speech.
• E. Planned Parenthood v. Danforth
  Planned Parenthood v. Danforth was a 1976 U.S. Supreme Court decision that struck down several Missouri abortion restrictions, including spousal and parental consent requirements, as unconstitutional.
• F. None of above. chosen