Triple
T12467270
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Nokia 8146 |
E297956
|
entity |
| Predicate | designPositioning |
P105157
|
FINISHED |
| Object | higher-end design |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: higher-end design | Statement: [Nokia 8146, designPositioning, higher-end design]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: designPositioning Context triple: [Nokia 8146, designPositioning, higher-end design]
-
A.
positioning
Indicates the spatial or contextual arrangement of one entity relative to another or within a given environment.
-
B.
stylePositioning
Indicates how an entity is spatially or visually arranged or aligned relative to a reference frame or other elements.
-
C.
designLocation
Indicates the place or setting where something is conceived, planned, or designed.
-
D.
designedByPosition
Indicates that something is created or planned by an entity identified by a particular role or job position, rather than by a specific individual.
-
E.
hasPositioning
Indicates that one entity occupies, is arranged in, or is assigned a specific spatial or relative position with respect to another entity or reference frame.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d6ada270808190b1a2b2e7b02bb426 |
completed | April 8, 2026, 7:33 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d94e626dbc8190ac7dcdb542ba9b0c |
completed | April 10, 2026, 7:24 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d94d3f701c81909dd0e00251ac8553 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 7:19 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69d94e5f8d04819086d1ad4d62364005 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 7:24 p.m. |
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:56 p.m.