Triple

T12460676
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Article 2(4) of the United Nations Charter E297781 entity
Predicate invokedIn P6455 FINISHED
Object Nicaragua v. United States of America (ICJ, 1986) E846823 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Nicaragua v. United States of America (ICJ, 1986) | Statement: [Article 2(4) of the United Nations Charter, invokedIn, Nicaragua v. United States of America (ICJ, 1986)]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: Nicaragua v. United States of America (ICJ, 1986)
Context triple: [Article 2(4) of the United Nations Charter, invokedIn, Nicaragua v. United States of America (ICJ, 1986)]
  • A. International Court of Justice case Nicaragua v. United States chosen
    The International Court of Justice case Nicaragua v. United States was a landmark 1980s legal dispute in which Nicaragua successfully challenged U.S. support for Contra rebels and other interventions as violations of international law.
  • B. International Court of Justice case France v. United Kingdom (1953)
    The International Court of Justice case France v. United Kingdom (1953) was a territorial dispute in which the ICJ adjudicated sovereignty over the Channel Islands groups of Les Écréhous and Minquiers between the two states.
  • C. The Gambia v. Myanmar
    The Gambia v. Myanmar is an ongoing case before the International Court of Justice in which The Gambia accuses Myanmar of violating the Genocide Convention through its treatment of the Rohingya population.
  • D. Permanent Court of International Justice decision in the Lotus case
    The Permanent Court of International Justice decision in the Lotus case was a landmark 1927 ruling that shaped international law on jurisdiction by affirming Turkey’s right to prosecute a French officer after a high-seas collision, emphasizing state sovereignty in the absence of prohibitive rules.
  • E. International Court of Justice advisory opinion on Western Sahara (1975)
    The International Court of Justice advisory opinion on Western Sahara (1975) was a landmark legal ruling that concluded Western Sahara was not terra nullius at the time of Spanish colonization and affirmed the Sahrawi people's right to self-determination.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d6ada270808190b1a2b2e7b02bb426 completed April 8, 2026, 7:33 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69d94db465c48190bcfaf22f25ef8947 completed April 10, 2026, 7:21 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69f63f1d4f248190a0805e17da42eaf7 completed May 2, 2026, 6:14 p.m.
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:56 p.m.