Triple

T12447032
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Gorges de la Jonte E297426 entity
Predicate knownForActivity P8834 FINISHED
Object vulture watching LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: vulture watching | Statement: [Gorges de la Jonte, knownForActivity, vulture watching]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: knownForActivity
Context triple: [Gorges de la Jonte, knownForActivity, vulture watching]
  • A. namedForKnownFor
    Indicates that one entity is named after another entity specifically because that other entity is notable or recognized for something.
  • B. knownIn
    Indicates that an entity is recognized, acknowledged, or familiar within a particular context, domain, or group.
  • C. formerlyKnownFor
    Indicates that an entity was previously recognized or notable for a particular role, attribute, or activity, but is no longer primarily associated with it.
  • D. activityType chosen
    Indicates the specific kind or category of action or event that an entity is engaged in or associated with.
  • E. alsoKnownFor
    Indicates that an entity is additionally recognized or noted for another work, role, achievement, or characteristic beyond its primary association.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d6ada166c48190b902972cd2408fa3 completed April 8, 2026, 7:33 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69d95151e7348190a1d4953a8b416a13 completed April 10, 2026, 7:36 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69d94d3c27a08190a0237200203e476d completed April 10, 2026, 7:19 p.m.
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:56 p.m.