Triple

T12441947
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Portrait of Victor Hugo E297294 entity
Predicate depictsLiteraryStatus P105044 FINISHED
Object canonical writer LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: canonical writer | Statement: [Portrait of Victor Hugo, depictsLiteraryStatus, canonical writer]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: depictsLiteraryStatus
Context triple: [Portrait of Victor Hugo, depictsLiteraryStatus, canonical writer]
  • A. fictionalStatus
    Indicates that an entity exists only in imagination or narrative and does not correspond to a real-world counterpart.
  • B. hasLiteraryForm
    Indicates that one entity is expressed, structured, or realized in a particular literary form (such as a genre, style, or textual format).
  • C. literaryFeature
    Indicates a relationship where something possesses or exhibits a characteristic, device, or stylistic element used in literature.
  • D. hasLiterarySignificance
    Indicates that something holds notable importance, influence, or value within the realm of literature or literary studies.
  • E. inLiterature
    Indicates that a work, concept, or entity is mentioned, discussed, or represented within a piece of literature.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d6ada166c48190b902972cd2408fa3 completed April 8, 2026, 7:33 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69d95151e7348190a1d4953a8b416a13 completed April 10, 2026, 7:36 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69d94d3c27a08190a0237200203e476d completed April 10, 2026, 7:19 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69d9511989ac8190ade98f52f66f7cd4 completed April 10, 2026, 7:35 p.m.
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:55 p.m.