Triple

T124211
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Why I Am Not a Christian E2510 entity
Predicate philosophicalPositionExpressed P4931 FINISHED
Object agnosticism about God LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: agnosticism about God | Statement: [Why I Am Not a Christian, philosophicalPositionExpressed, agnosticism about God]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: philosophicalPositionExpressed
Context triple: [Why I Am Not a Christian, philosophicalPositionExpressed, agnosticism about God]
  • A. philosophicalTheme
    Indicates that a work, idea, or discourse centrally involves or explores a particular philosophical concept, question, or line of thought.
  • B. policyStance
    Indicates the position or viewpoint an entity holds regarding a specific policy or set of policies.
  • C. philosophicalTradition
    Indicates a relationship where an entity is associated with, belongs to, or is characterized by a particular philosophical school, movement, or line of thought.
  • D. subjectPosition
    Indicates the spatial or logical position of a subject relative to a reference frame, context, or other entities.
  • E. constitutionalPosition
    Indicates the official role, office, or status an entity holds within a constitutional or legal framework.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a251b54ea88190b18281669f59b4c0 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 2:23 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a2573ce0ac8190b49fb31d3d475bf9 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 2:47 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a2564a54948190ba30bee858173b27 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 2:43 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69a256ea776081908fec36c3fdfb8d84 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 2:46 a.m.
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 2:27 a.m.