Triple

T12412534
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Horst E296551 entity
Predicate respondentIn P2238 FINISHED
Object Helvering v. Horst E61236 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Helvering v. Horst | Statement: [Horst, respondentIn, Helvering v. Horst]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Helvering v. Horst
Context triple: [Horst, respondentIn, Helvering v. Horst]
  • A. Helvering v. Horst chosen
    Helvering v. Horst is a 1940 U.S. Supreme Court case that established key principles of the assignment of income doctrine in federal tax law.
  • B. Helvering v. Clifford
    Helvering v. Clifford is a landmark 1940 U.S. Supreme Court tax law case that clarified when income from a trust should be attributed to the grantor for federal income tax purposes.
  • C. Helvering v. Eubank
    Helvering v. Eubank is a U.S. Supreme Court tax law decision addressing when income from assigned rights is taxable to the assignor rather than the assignee.
  • D. Helvering v. Gregory
    Helvering v. Gregory is a landmark 1935 U.S. Supreme Court tax law case that established the principle that transactions must have a genuine business purpose beyond tax avoidance to be respected for tax purposes.
  • E. Helvering v. Bruun
    Helvering v. Bruun is a 1940 U.S. Supreme Court case that addressed whether a landlord realizes taxable income when repossessing property improved by a tenant.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d6ad9f464c81909db36d7e96e34b9e completed April 8, 2026, 7:33 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69d94d6b0f9c8190813b6fe3f97570ac completed April 10, 2026, 7:20 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69f63f002b7c81909ee9d4ea3ea6d5f2 completed May 2, 2026, 6:14 p.m.
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:55 p.m.