Triple

T12407403
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Peace and Friendship Treaties E296422 entity
Predicate referencedIn P519 FINISHED
Object R v. Marshall (1999)
R v. Marshall (1999) is a landmark Supreme Court of Canada decision that affirmed Mi'kmaq treaty rights to fish and hunt for a moderate livelihood based on 18th-century Peace and Friendship Treaties.
E980807 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (4 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: R v. Marshall (1999) | Statement: [Peace and Friendship Treaties, referencedIn, R v. Marshall (1999)]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: R v. Marshall (1999)
Context triple: [Peace and Friendship Treaties, referencedIn, R v. Marshall (1999)]
  • A. R v Oakes
    R v Oakes is a landmark 1986 Supreme Court of Canada decision that established the proportionality framework used to justify limits on rights under the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.
  • B. R v McIlkenny and others
    R v McIlkenny and others is the criminal case in which the men later known as the Birmingham Six were controversially convicted in 1975 for the Birmingham pub bombings, convictions that were ultimately quashed in 1991.
  • C. R (Jackson) v Attorney General
    R (Jackson) v Attorney General is a landmark 2005 House of Lords case that examined the constitutional validity of legislation enacted under the Parliament Acts and explored fundamental principles about the limits of parliamentary sovereignty and the rule of law in the UK.
  • D. R. v. Lavell
    R. v. Lavell is a landmark 1974 Supreme Court of Canada decision that addressed sex discrimination in the Indian Act and tested the scope and effectiveness of the Canadian Bill of Rights in protecting equality rights.
  • E. X v. Rex
    X v. Rex is a classic detective novel by Philip MacDonald featuring a tense murder investigation and intricate courtroom drama.
  • F. None of above. chosen
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NEDg Description generation gpt-5.1
Instruction
Generate a one-sentence description of the target entity. 
You are given a context triple in the form (subject, predicate, object), where the object is the target entity. 
# Instructions
Use the triple to infer relevant information about the entity. Describe the entity based on what is most defining, well-known. 
Avoid repeating the information from the triple, unless really essential.
# Response Format
Return only the sentence: "Description: [one-sentence description of the target entity]"
Input
Entity: R v. Marshall (1999)
Triple: [Peace and Friendship Treaties, referencedIn, R v. Marshall (1999)]
Generated description
R v. Marshall (1999) is a landmark Supreme Court of Canada decision that affirmed Mi'kmaq treaty rights to fish and hunt for a moderate livelihood based on 18th-century Peace and Friendship Treaties.
NED2 Entity disambiguation (via description) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: R v. Marshall (1999)
Target entity description: R v. Marshall (1999) is a landmark Supreme Court of Canada decision that affirmed Mi'kmaq treaty rights to fish and hunt for a moderate livelihood based on 18th-century Peace and Friendship Treaties.
  • A. R v Oakes
    R v Oakes is a landmark 1986 Supreme Court of Canada decision that established the proportionality framework used to justify limits on rights under the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.
  • B. R v McIlkenny and others
    R v McIlkenny and others is the criminal case in which the men later known as the Birmingham Six were controversially convicted in 1975 for the Birmingham pub bombings, convictions that were ultimately quashed in 1991.
  • C. R (Jackson) v Attorney General
    R (Jackson) v Attorney General is a landmark 2005 House of Lords case that examined the constitutional validity of legislation enacted under the Parliament Acts and explored fundamental principles about the limits of parliamentary sovereignty and the rule of law in the UK.
  • D. R. v. Lavell
    R. v. Lavell is a landmark 1974 Supreme Court of Canada decision that addressed sex discrimination in the Indian Act and tested the scope and effectiveness of the Canadian Bill of Rights in protecting equality rights.
  • E. X v. Rex
    X v. Rex is a classic detective novel by Philip MacDonald featuring a tense murder investigation and intricate courtroom drama.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (5 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d6ad9f464c81909db36d7e96e34b9e completed April 8, 2026, 7:33 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69d94d4a08e0819085c656e35038e6b2 completed April 10, 2026, 7:19 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69f63488cac08190a81b2151c827932e completed May 2, 2026, 5:29 p.m.
NEDg Description generation batch_69f635997b088190b6207fcac5594eb2 completed May 2, 2026, 5:34 p.m.
NED2 Entity disambiguation (via description) batch_69f636d727a08190882eec3fd664b64d completed May 2, 2026, 5:39 p.m.
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:55 p.m.