Triple
T124058
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Principia Mathematica |
E2507
|
entity |
| Predicate | logicSystem |
P4930
|
FINISHED |
| Object | ramified theory of types |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: ramified theory of types | Statement: [Principia Mathematica, logicSystem, ramified theory of types]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: logicSystem Context triple: [Principia Mathematica, logicSystem, ramified theory of types]
-
A.
decisionLanguage
Indicates that a decision, statement, or choice is expressed or recorded in a particular natural language.
-
B.
legalSystem
Indicates the formal framework of laws, rules, and institutions that governs how legal matters are defined, interpreted, and enforced within a society or jurisdiction.
-
C.
legalDoctrine
Indicates that one legal principle, rule, or theory is being applied, referenced, or relied upon as an authoritative basis for interpreting or deciding a legal issue.
-
D.
notableSystem
Indicates that a system is recognized as significant, prominent, or noteworthy in a particular context or domain.
-
E.
hasFormulation
Indicates that one entity is expressed, prepared, or configured in a particular form or composition defined by another entity.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a251b54ea88190b18281669f59b4c0 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:23 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a2573ce0ac8190b49fb31d3d475bf9 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:47 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a2564a54948190ba30bee858173b27 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:43 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69a256ea776081908fec36c3fdfb8d84 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:46 a.m. |
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 2:27 a.m.