Triple
T1240208
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Prohibition era in the United States |
E26639
|
entity |
| Predicate | repealProcess |
P25879
|
FINISHED |
| Object | state ratifying conventions |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: state ratifying conventions | Statement: [Prohibition era in the United States, repealProcess, state ratifying conventions]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: repealProcess Context triple: [Prohibition era in the United States, repealProcess, state ratifying conventions]
-
A.
repealed
Indicates that a law, rule, or regulation has been officially revoked or annulled so that it no longer has legal effect.
-
B.
reform
Indicates bringing about significant changes to an existing system, practice, or entity in order to improve or correct it.
-
C.
repudiatedAfter
Indicates that one entity formally rejects, disavows, or withdraws support for another entity after a specified time or subsequent event.
-
D.
repudiatedOn
Indicates the specific date or time at which something (such as a claim, agreement, or association) was formally rejected, disowned, or renounced.
-
E.
proposedAmendment
Indicates that one entity has formally suggested a change or addition (an amendment) to another entity, such as a document, law, or agreement.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a4948689d08190b3a4a3f388c02148 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 7:33 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a4bf4343e48190a232abd8475880a0 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 10:35 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a4bb696a38819095845c84f0241287 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 10:19 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69a4bce611ec819092cb13d354d0903e |
completed | March 1, 2026, 10:25 p.m. |
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:47 p.m.