Triple
T12399181
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Commissioner v. Glenshaw Glass Co. |
E296201
|
entity |
| Predicate | citationParallel |
P76460
|
FINISHED |
| Object | 75 S. Ct. 473 |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 75 S. Ct. 473 | Statement: [Commissioner v. Glenshaw Glass Co., citationParallel, 75 S. Ct. 473]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: citationParallel Context triple: [Commissioner v. Glenshaw Glass Co., citationParallel, 75 S. Ct. 473]
-
A.
hasParallelCitation
chosen
Indicates that one legal case or document is cited in multiple sources or reporters that refer to the same underlying authority.
-
B.
citationOf
Indicates that one entity cites, references, or formally acknowledges another entity as a source.
-
C.
citationBy
Indicates that one work is cited or referenced by another work.
-
D.
citationIn
Indicates that one work cites, references, or otherwise acknowledges another work as a source.
-
E.
citationAs
Indicates that one entity is cited or referenced in the role or capacity specified by another entity (such as a particular work, version, or context).
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d6ad9f464c81909db36d7e96e34b9e |
completed | April 8, 2026, 7:33 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d93fd448f08190af425a569d7ed158 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 6:22 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d93ed4cea08190ad374d3f6a798053 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 6:17 p.m. |
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:54 p.m.