Triple

T12399091
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Bruun E296199 entity
Predicate partyInCase P15954 FINISHED
Object Helvering v. Bruun E60924 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Helvering v. Bruun | Statement: [Bruun, partyInCase, Helvering v. Bruun]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: Helvering v. Bruun
Context triple: [Bruun, partyInCase, Helvering v. Bruun]
  • A. Helvering v. Bruun chosen
    Helvering v. Bruun is a 1940 U.S. Supreme Court case that addressed whether a landlord realizes taxable income when repossessing property improved by a tenant.
  • B. Helvering v. Eubank
    Helvering v. Eubank is a U.S. Supreme Court tax law decision addressing when income from assigned rights is taxable to the assignor rather than the assignee.
  • C. Helvering v. Horst
    Helvering v. Horst is a 1940 U.S. Supreme Court case that established key principles of the assignment of income doctrine in federal tax law.
  • D. Helvering v. Clifford
    Helvering v. Clifford is a landmark 1940 U.S. Supreme Court tax law case that clarified when income from a trust should be attributed to the grantor for federal income tax purposes.
  • E. Helvering v. Davis
    Helvering v. Davis is a 1937 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the constitutionality of the Social Security Act and broadly affirmed federal power to tax and spend for the general welfare.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d6ad9f464c81909db36d7e96e34b9e completed April 8, 2026, 7:33 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69d93fd448f08190af425a569d7ed158 completed April 10, 2026, 6:22 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69f63480a8bc8190885130f63a3ec761 completed May 2, 2026, 5:29 p.m.
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:54 p.m.