Triple

T12390311
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Greek Catholics E295975 entity
Predicate usesLiturgicalChant P88276 FINISHED
Object Byzantine chant LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Byzantine chant | Statement: [Greek Catholics, usesLiturgicalChant, Byzantine chant]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: usesLiturgicalChant
Context triple: [Greek Catholics, usesLiturgicalChant, Byzantine chant]
  • A. usesLiturgicalMelody chosen
    Indicates that one entity employs or incorporates a specific liturgical melody in its music or performance.
  • B. hasLiturgicalTone
    Indicates that something (such as a chant, text, or musical phrase) is associated with or performed in a specific liturgical tone or mode.
  • C. hasLiturgicalExpression
    Indicates that one entity expresses, embodies, or is manifested through the liturgical practices, rites, or worship forms of another entity.
  • D. usesAlsoLiturgy
    Indicates that an entity additionally employs or follows a particular liturgy alongside its primary or other liturgical practices.
  • E. includesLiturgicalUse
    Indicates that something encompasses or involves use within a liturgical or formal religious worship context.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d6ad9e653c8190b1473c860ee53dae completed April 8, 2026, 7:33 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69d93fd0bcc48190bb1a59a3aaa6bfdf completed April 10, 2026, 6:22 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69d93ed256788190b704cad171a4824e completed April 10, 2026, 6:17 p.m.
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:54 p.m.