Triple

T1238220
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Hannah E26596 entity
Predicate hasTraditionalFormIn P24858 FINISHED
Object Hebrew LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Hebrew | Statement: [Hannah, hasTraditionalFormIn, Hebrew]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasTraditionalFormIn
Context triple: [Hannah, hasTraditionalFormIn, Hebrew]
  • A. hasTraditionalSymbol
    Indicates that something is associated with or represented by a conventional or culturally established symbol.
  • B. isTraditional
    Indicates that something adheres to long-established customs, practices, or norms rather than modern or innovative ones.
  • C. hasTraditionalName
    Indicates that an entity is associated with a name traditionally used or recognized for it, often rooted in long-standing cultural or historical practice.
  • D. hasTraditionIn
    Indicates that a particular tradition, custom, or longstanding practice is present, observed, or established within a specified place, group, or context.
  • E. traditionallyOneOf
    Indicates that something is customarily or historically considered to belong to a specific set, category, or group.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a4948571c88190a9191e451e6035fd completed March 1, 2026, 7:33 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a4bf406b988190a12aa26bbcb88d6a completed March 1, 2026, 10:35 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a4bb67d52c8190815d6356b79d6ed5 completed March 1, 2026, 10:19 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69a4bbf83584819088c69366f58586cc completed March 1, 2026, 10:21 p.m.
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:47 p.m.