Triple
T12372129
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | AP exams |
E295027
|
entity |
| Predicate | testSecurity |
P104832
|
FINISHED |
| Object | standardized administration procedures |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: standardized administration procedures | Statement: [AP exams, testSecurity, standardized administration procedures]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: testSecurity Context triple: [AP exams, testSecurity, standardized administration procedures]
-
A.
securityAccess
Indicates that one entity has permission, authorization, or the ability to access or interact with another entity in a security-controlled context.
-
B.
securityService
Indicates a relationship where an entity provides or is responsible for protective, safeguarding, or defense-related services for another entity or system.
-
C.
securityOutcome
Indicates the result or consequence of a security-related event, measure, or decision for the involved entities.
-
D.
hasSecurityFunction
Indicates that an entity performs, provides, or is responsible for a security-related role, protection mechanism, or safeguarding function for another entity or system.
-
E.
securityStatus
Indicates the current level or condition of protection, risk, or vulnerability associated with an entity or system.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d6ab6d8a4081908636601e69ddf262 |
completed | April 8, 2026, 7:24 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d942a2d6e08190a13c7ff89af09354 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 6:34 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d93ecf6b548190a394b6b56a0c1c68 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 6:17 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69d9429ff2bc8190b09adf8f57fad451 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 6:34 p.m. |
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:54 p.m.