Triple

T12325783
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Systemic Advocacy Management System E293824 entity
Predicate typeOfIssueTracked P17287 FINISHED
Object IRS policy issues LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: IRS policy issues | Statement: [Systemic Advocacy Management System, typeOfIssueTracked, IRS policy issues]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: typeOfIssueTracked
Context triple: [Systemic Advocacy Management System, typeOfIssueTracked, IRS policy issues]
  • A. issueType chosen
    Indicates the specific category or classification assigned to an issue within a tracking or management context.
  • B. usesIssueTracker
    Indicates that one entity employs or relies on another entity as its issue or bug tracking system.
  • C. knownIssue
    Indicates that the subject has an issue or problem that is already identified, recognized, or documented.
  • D. underlyingIssue
    Indicates that one situation, problem, or condition is the fundamental cause or root problem behind another.
  • E. facingIssue
    Indicates that an entity is currently experiencing, encountering, or dealing with a problem, difficulty, or obstacle.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d6ab6ae0dc8190b1522a9c1c55c114 completed April 8, 2026, 7:24 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69d93f621570819091ee1db2609233ea completed April 10, 2026, 6:20 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69d93ec5be788190b82d2edc6a0f1095 completed April 10, 2026, 6:17 p.m.
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:53 p.m.