Triple

T12322831
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject AWS CodeDeploy E293764 entity
Predicate supportsDeploymentType P85293 FINISHED
Object in-place deployment LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: in-place deployment | Statement: [AWS CodeDeploy, supportsDeploymentType, in-place deployment]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: supportsDeploymentType
Context triple: [AWS CodeDeploy, supportsDeploymentType, in-place deployment]
  • A. deploymentType
    Indicates the manner or configuration in which a system, application, or component is deployed or made operational.
  • B. typeOfDeployment
    Indicates the specific manner or configuration in which something (such as a system, application, or resource) is deployed or made operational.
  • C. canDeployAs chosen
    Indicates that one entity is capable of being deployed or instantiated in the role, form, or environment represented by another entity.
  • D. supportsWorkloadType
    Indicates that one entity is capable of handling, operating with, or being compatible with a specified type of workload.
  • E. supportsType
    Indicates that one entity is capable of handling, accepting, or being compatible with a specified type.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d6ab6ae0dc8190b1522a9c1c55c114 completed April 8, 2026, 7:24 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69d93f621570819091ee1db2609233ea completed April 10, 2026, 6:20 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69d93ec5be788190b82d2edc6a0f1095 completed April 10, 2026, 6:17 p.m.
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:53 p.m.