Triple
T12320681
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Laxmangarh |
E293719
|
entity |
| Predicate | region |
P40
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Shekhawati |
E58842
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Shekhawati | Statement: [Laxmangarh, region, Shekhawati]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Shekhawati Context triple: [Laxmangarh, region, Shekhawati]
-
A.
Shekhawati
chosen
Shekhawati is a dialect of the Rajasthani language spoken primarily in the Shekhawati region of northern Rajasthan, India.
-
B.
Kishangarh State
Kishangarh State was a princely state in colonial India, ruled by Rajput princes and located in the region historically known as Rajputana (now largely in Rajasthan).
-
C.
Maharawat
Maharawat is a hereditary royal title historically used by the ruling monarchs of certain princely states in India, including Pratapgarh.
-
D.
Bikaner State
Bikaner State was a princely state in northwestern India, ruled by Rajput kings and centered on the city of Bikaner in present-day Rajasthan.
-
E.
Jodhpur State
Jodhpur State was a princely state in western India, ruled by the Rathore Rajput dynasty with its capital at Jodhpur, that existed under British suzerainty until Indian independence.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d6ab6ae0dc8190b1522a9c1c55c114 |
completed | April 8, 2026, 7:24 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d93f4c2b548190938fff9427f07dc7 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 6:19 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69f6555e525c8190aa72da362fae1e3e |
completed | May 2, 2026, 7:49 p.m. |
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:53 p.m.